ArticleCurrent protocols2024
Whole Blood Aggregometry in Mice.
Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing piroxicam for antithrombotic and cardiopulmonary protection: Pharmacological rationale and therapeutic potential.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aggregometry plays a crucial role in both clinical diagnostics and research within hematology, serving as a fundamental tool for understanding platelet function and its implications in physiological and pathological processes. In research, aggregometry provides insights into platelet aggregation dynamics and aids in understanding the underlying mechanisms of hemostasis, thrombosis, and related disorders. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and lumi-aggregometry, as well as whole blood aggregometry, are commonly employed methods. While LTA and lumi-aggregometry allow for specific platelet function assessment under controlled conditions, whole blood aggregometry provides a more physiologically relevant approach by evaluating platelet aggregation within the context of whole blood. Although both methodologies offer unique advantages, whole blood aggregometry allows for preservation of the native cellular environment, simplicity, and potential for better clinical correlation. In a clinical setting, with human blood samples, protocols are established for both LTA and whole blood aggregometry as they are frequently used diagnostic tools. A protocol for LTA and lumi-aggregometry in murine models has been described; however, to date, there is no standardized protocol for whole blood aggregometry in murine models accessible to hematology researchers. This article aims to outline a simple, basic protocol for murine whole blood aggregometry, offering an alternative method to the commonly used LTA aggregometry in research settings. Standardizing whole blood aggregometry protocols in murine models could enhance experimental reliability and facilitate translational research efforts in hematology. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Whole blood aggregometry in mice Support Protocol: Phenylhydrazine-induced anemia in wild-type mice Basic Protocol 2: Hematocrit percentage in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.