ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2024
Therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the management of rib fractures.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in patients with rib fractures.
methodsThis study retrospectively collected data from patients with acute rib fractures at Ming-Sheng General Hospital from 2020 to 2022 and excluded those who underwent surgical intervention or with severe extrathoracic injuries. PRP was extracted using the patient's blood and injected via ultrasound guidance near the fracture site. Patients self-assessed pain levels and medication usage at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Pulmonary function tests were conducted at 4 weeks.
resultsThis study included 255 patients, with 160 and 95 patients in the conservative (only pain medications administered) and PRP groups (PRP and analgesics administered), respectively. The PRP group reported lower pain levels than the conservative group at 2 and 4 weeks. No substantial differences in medication usage were observed between the groups. The PRP group demonstrated lower pain levels and medication usage than the conservative group in severe rib fractures (≥3 ribs) and better lung function improvement at 4 weeks. After propensity score matching, the PRP group still had a better treatment outcome in pain control and lung function recovery.
conclusionPRP demonstrated considerable therapeutic efficacy in patients with severe rib fractures, resulting in reduced pain, decreased medication usage, and improved lung function but with no substantial benefits in patients with mild rib fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.