ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2024
Children and young adults with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma metastatic to bone treated on Children's Oncology Group studies.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case report: pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma presenting with bone marrow metastasis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. Despite bone metastases being present in 5% of patients at diagnosis, there are limited studies examining these outcomes. We sought to define the prognostic factors, clinical courses, and outcomes of children treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials with RMS metastatic to bone at diagnosis.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with bone metastatic RMS enrolled on COG RMS clinical trials (D9802, D9803, ARST0431, or ARST08P1) between 1997 and 2013.
resultsRMS metastatic to bone was identified in 154 patients at a median age of 14.9 years at diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, 90% had metastases at additional sites, 74% had alveolar histology, and extremity was the most common primary site (31%). Eighty-six percent of patients (n = 133) received radiation therapy. The 3- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 15.4% and 14.5%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 30.4% and 18.0%, respectively. We identified alveolar histology, FOXO1 fusion presence, unfavorable primary location, higher Oberlin score, and lack of radiation as poor prognostic characteristics for both EFS and OS in univariate analysis. Lack of radiation was not significant when excluding patients with events prior to 20 weeks.
conclusionsThis study is the largest analysis of patients with bone metastatic RMS, and defines the poor overall outcomes and negative prognostic factors for these patients. They may be eligible for therapy deintensification for improved quality of life or pursuit of novel treatments/approaches, which are desperately needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.