Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39016560›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Evaluation of a BioFire multiplex PCR panel for detection of joint infections using retrospective and prospectively collected specimens.

Angelica Moran, Jekzaly Arellano, Karen Bregman, Erin McElvania

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. IDCases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. BioFireAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angelica MoranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-2182
Jekzaly ArellanoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Karen BregmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Erin McElvaniaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3959-2583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BioFire Joint Infection Panel (JI panel) is a newly FDA-approved multiplex PCR assay for detection of common bone and joint pathogens with 39 targets which include select Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, yeast, and antimicrobial resistance genes. We evaluated the performance of the JI panel in detecting joint infections in our patient population. Sixty-three frozen, residual joint fluid specimens were retrospectively tested using the JI panel. An additional 104 residual joint fluid specimens were de-identified and prospectively tested within 1 week of collection. Results from routine bacterial cultures were used as the reference standard, which included inoculation to agar plates and blood culture bottles. For the frozen specimens, the JI panel showed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 92.8% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 97.1%. PPA was 71.4% and NPA was 94.8% for fresh specimens. A total of 12 discrepancies were observed among the 167 specimens tested. The JI panel demonstrated good overall agreement with routine culture for the detection of joint infections and may improve timely diagnosis when used in conjunction with bacterial culture. However, potential false-positive and false-negative results were observed in both retrospective and prospective testing of specimens.IMPORTANCEThe BioFire JI panel is a new commercially available multiplex PCR assay for detecting common pathogens causing bone and joint infections. The test is performed directly on joint fluids with a fast turnaround time of 1 hour. Our study shows that while the JI panel overall shows good agreement with routine culture, discrepancies were observed in 7% of cases and results should be interpreted with appropriate clinical context.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedArthritis, InfectiousBacteriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBioFirejoint infectionsmultiplex PCR

Identifiers

PMID39016560
PMCPMC11323555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.