Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39016443›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

Clinical characteristics and predictors of long-term postoperative urinary incontinence in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity-matched analysis.

Yuki Kohada, Hiroyuki Kitano, Ryo Tasaka, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Tomoya Hatayama, Hiroyuki Shikuma, Kyohsuke Iwane, Kazuma Yukihiro, Kenshiro Takemoto, Miki Naito and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuki KohadaDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroyuki KitanoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryo TasakaDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shunsuke MiyamotoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoya HatayamaDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1953-3240
Hiroyuki ShikumaDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kyohsuke IwaneDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuma YukihiroDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kenshiro TakemotoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Miki NaitoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kohei KobatakeDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-3916
Yohei SekinoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keisuke GotoDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-1401
Akihiro GorikiDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keisuke HiedaDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuyuki HinataDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-6812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics and predictors of long-term postoperative urinary incontinence (PUI) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

methodsThis study included patients who underwent RARP at our institution and were stratified into PUI (≥1 pad/day) and continence (0 pad/day) groups at 60 months after RARP. A propensity score-matched analysis with multiple preoperative urinary status (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary subdomains, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and IPSS-quality of life scores) was performed to match preoperative urinary status in these groups. Serial changes in urinary status and treatment satisfaction preoperatively and until 60 months after RARP were compared, and predictors of long-term PUI were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsA total of 228 patients were included in the PUI and continence groups (114 patients each). Although no significant difference in preoperative urinary status was observed between the two groups, the postoperative urinary status significantly worsened overall in the PUI group than in the continence group. Treatment satisfaction was also significantly lower in the PUI group than in the continence group from 12 to 60 months postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (≥70 years) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were significant predictors of the long-term PUI group (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPatients with long-term PUI had poor overall postoperative urinary status and lower treatment satisfaction than the continence group. Considering the age and risk of BCR is important for predicting long-term PUI when performing RARP.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary IncontinenceAgedHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factorsprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsquality of liferobot‐assisted surgeryurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID39016443
PMCPMC11524109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.