ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2024
Community health worker training on older adults: A qualitative needs assessment.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connected Care for Older Adults: A Pilot Intervention Engaging Community Health Workers to Advance Age-Friendly Care in Rural Oregon.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Simulation training for holistic and systematic health needs assessments of older adults: a qualitative study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Empowering community health workers in dementia care in South Texas.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Geriatric-focused education for community health workers: a dementia training that effectively provides knowledge and skills to address dementia within the scope of practice of this public health workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Bridging communities, prevention, and heart health: U.S. strategies for CHW cardiovascular training and integration.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Review
- Age-related variations in HbA1c improvements: insights from a telehealth-supported community-based intervention.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health personnel who serve as liaisons between vulnerable patient populations and the healthcare system. They are instrumental in health promotion and education for urban-dwelling older adults. However, no research exists on training that CHWs receive on age-friendly health care. This article explores CHW education on the 4Ms of an Age-Friendly Health System and identifies areas where additional training may be necessary.
methodsAs part of a two-pronged qualitative needs assessment, four focus groups were held with a total of 17 CHWs and semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including both healthcare providers and social workers. Focus group and interview transcripts were then analyzed for major themes in Dedoose, a qualitative coding software.
resultsClinicians most often identified Mentation and Mobility as areas where CHWs can have the greatest impact. Correspondingly, CHWs felt under-equipped to assist patients in these areas and expressed strong interest in additional training. In general, CHWs and clinicians agreed that Medications and What Matters do not fall under CHW scope of practice.
conclusionsOur findings confirm the critical role that CHWs can play in promoting the health and well-being of urban-dwelling older adults. However, we also demonstrate that many CHWs lack adequate training in age-friendly care. To meet the social and medical needs of a rapidly aging US population, there is a pertinent need to develop a novel community health worker training curriculum on Mentation and Mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.