SynthesisStroke2024
Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect With Standard Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Spatial neglect in parietal glioma patients: what do we know? a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Upper extremity function and disability recovery with vibration therapy after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Integrated Neurorehabilitation Including EEG-Neurofeedback for Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Right Thalamo-Mesencephalic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Case Report.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Investigating the correlation between neural and muscular activities during bilateral arm training in stroke survivors: A cross-sectional study.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Disrupted integration-segregation balance in the intact hemisphere in chronic spatial neglect.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Characterizing visual compensation for proprioceptive impairments during the subacute phase of stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Analysis of recovery-related white matter microstructures in visual spatial neglect based on diffusion tensor imaging.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- The mini-Oxford cognitive screen (Mini-OCS): A very brief cognitive screen for use in chronic stroke.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- The Neuropsychology of Chronic Neurological Disorders: A Review of Cognitive and Emotional Impairments.Cureus · 2025Review
- The mini-Oxford cognitive screen (Mini-OCS): A very brief cognitive screen for use in chronic stroke.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- From acute neglect to chronic constructional deficits: parietotemporal contributions to long-term post-stroke impairments.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Neurorehabilitation of Visual Neglect: A Narrative Review of Approaches from A.R. Luria to Modern Clinical Protocols.Consortium psychiatricum · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisuospatial neglect is a common consequence of stroke and is characterized by impaired attention to contralesional space. Currently, the extent and time course of recovery from neglect are not clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the recovery trajectory of poststroke neglect with standard treatment.
methodsPsycInfo, Embase, and MEDLINE were searched for articles reporting recovery rates of neglect after stroke. Time since stroke was categorized into early (0-3 months), mid (3-6 months), and late (>6 months) recovery phases. Random-effects models for pooled prevalence were generated for each phase, and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored with metaregressions. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, with low-quality studies excluded in sensitivity analyses.
resultsThe search captured 4130 articles including duplicates, and 111 full-text reviews were undertaken. A total of 27 studies reporting data from 839 stroke survivors with neglect were included for review. Meta-analyses indicated a recovery rate of 42% in the early phase, which increased to 53% in the mid-recovery phase. Additional recovery in the late phase was minimal, with an estimated 56% recovery rate. Heterogeneity of studies was high (I
conclusionsMost recovery from neglect occurs in the first 3 months, although additional gains can be expected up to 6 months poststroke. While a large proportion of patients recover from neglect, over 40% show persistent symptoms. Further research is needed on effective rehabilitation interventions, particularly focusing on patients most at risk of chronic visuospatial neglect. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023388763.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.