Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015946›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

A predictive model combining connectomics and entropy biomarkers to discriminate long-term vagus nerve stimulation efficacy for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Tung-Yang Cheng, Yingbing Hu, Xiaoya Qin, Jiayi Ma, Daqi Zha, Han Xie, Taoyun Ji, Qingzhu Liu, Zhiyan Wang, Hongwei Hao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preoperative MEG reveals differential brain network characteristics in drug-resistant epilepsy patients based on vagus nerve stimulation response.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tung-Yang ChengNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0009-9737-3164
Yingbing HuNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoya QinNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jiayi MaDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-1770
Daqi ZhaNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Han XieDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Taoyun JiDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingzhu LiuPediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiyan WangCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongwei HaoNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ye WuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Luming LiNational Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2401205National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101549Shenzhen International Cooperation Research Project GJHZ20180930110402104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo predict the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) efficacy for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients, we aim to identify preimplantation biomarkers through clinical features and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and thus establish a predictive model from a multi-modal feature set with high prediction accuracy.

methodsSixty-five pediatric DRE patients implanted with VNS were included and followed up. We explored the topological network and entropy features of preimplantation EEG signals to identify the biomarkers for VNS efficacy. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) integrated these biomarkers to distinguish the efficacy groups.

resultsThe proportion of VNS responders was 58.5% (38/65) at the last follow-up. In the analysis of parieto-occipital α band activity, higher synchronization level and nodal efficiency were found in responders. The central-frontal θ band activity showed significantly lower entropy in responders. The prediction model reached an accuracy of 81.5%, a precision of 80.1%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.838.

conclusionOur results revealed that, compared to nonresponders, VNS responders had a more efficient α band brain network, especially in the parieto-occipital region, and less spectral complexity of θ brain activities in the central-frontal region. We established a predictive model integrating both preimplantation clinical and EEG features and exhibited great potential for discriminating the VNS responders. This study contributed to the understanding of the VNS mechanism and improved the performance of the current predictive model.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyEntropyVagus Nerve StimulationAdolescentBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersdrug‐resistant epilepsyfunctional connectivityHilbert‐Huang spectral entropysupport vector machineVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39015946
PMCPMC11252558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.