ArticleCureus2024
Logical Fallacies in Missed Diagnosis of Stridorous Patients: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheal stenosis and paradoxical vocal fold motion are both common laryngological diagnoses that can present with similar symptoms of dyspnea. Co-morbid psychiatric issues can complicate diagnostic accuracy and lead to logical fallacies in the attribution of symptom etiology. We present a case of a 38-year-old female who presented repeatedly to the emergency department with respiratory distress, inspiratory stridor, wheezing, and anxiety. On examination, she had stridor that appeared to correlate with episodes of elevated anxiety and bedside laryngoscopy which showed intermittent paradoxical vocal fold motion. A computed tomography scan showed 40% narrowing of the distal tracheal lumen, but symptoms were felt to be inconsistent and out of proportion to stenosis. She was seen several more times in the ED and eventually followed up in the laryngology clinic, where she had a tracheoscopy showing Cotton Meyer grade III stenosis. This unique case highlights the logical fallacies that may lead to misdiagnosis when evaluating stridorous patients with comorbid personality and anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.