ArticleGlomerular diseases
Design of a User-Centered Electronic Health Tool for Glomerular Disease Management.
Article in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with primary glomerular disease (GN) have unique management needs. We describe the design of a user-centered, patient-facing electronic health (eHealth) tool to support GN management. Methods: We surveyed patients and GN expert nephrologists on disease management tasks, educational needs, and barriers and facilitators of eHealth tool use. Results were summarized and presented to patients, nephrologists, engineers, and a behavioral and implementation science expert in stakeholder meetings to jointly design an eHealth tool. Key themes from the meetings are described using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Sixty-six patients with minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IgA nephropathy, and membranous nephropathy responded to the survey, as well as 25 nephrologists from the NIH-funded Cure Glomerulonephropathy study network. Overall, patients performed fewer management tasks and acknowledged fewer informational needs than recommended by nephrologists. Patients were more knowledgeable about eHealth tools than nephrologists. Nine patient stakeholders reflected on the survey findings and noted a lack of awareness of key recommended management tasks and receiving little guidance from nephrologists on using eHealth. Key themes and concepts from the stakeholder meetings about eHealth tool development included the need for customizable design, trustworthy sources, seamless integration with other apps and clinical workflow, and reliable data tracking. The final design of our eHealth tool, the UrApp System, has 5 core features: "Profile" generates personalized data tracking, educational information, facilitation with provider discussions and inputting other preferences; "Data Tracking" displays patient health data with the ability to communicate important trends to patients and nephrologists; "Resources" provides trusted education information in a personalized manner; "Calendar" displays key events and generate reminders; and "Journal" facilitates information documentation using written or audio notes. Conclusion: Our theory- and evidenced-based, stakeholder-engaged design process created designs for an eHealth tool to support the unique needs of patients with GN, optimized for effectiveness and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.