ArticleCase reports in neurology
Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke Treatment in the Setting of Aortic Dissection: Case Report.
Article in Case reports in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct Carotid Artery Exposure for Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Marfan Syndrome and Prior Total Arch Replacement.NMC case report journal · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Complications of Acute Aortic Syndrome.Journal of stroke · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke can occur in the setting of aortic dissection. Information concerning the utility of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy as an intervention for patients with aortic dissection who are experiencing an acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion is limited to a few case reports. Case series of patients presenting with this clinical situation are needed to further investigate the potential utility of this procedure when patients with acute ischemic stroke and aortic dissection are encountered. Case Presentation: We report a patient with a chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection with dissection extension into the left common carotid artery and left internal carotid artery who had a good clinical outcome following mechanical thrombectomy for a symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion. We also review other cases in which endovascular mechanical thrombectomy was conducted in patients with aortic dissection and acute ischemic stroke and discuss the potential risks and benefits of carotid artery stenting in this clinical situation. Conclusion: The rate of successful arterial recanalization in patients with aortic dissection, large vessel occlusion, and acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy is high. The intervention has been associated with good neurological outcomes and a low rate of procedure-related complications. Additional case series are needed to help discern if our observations are present in a broader array of patients in order to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from mechanical thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.