ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2024
A call for increased transparency and accountability of health care outcomes in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We Protect Us:" Immigration Enforcement Campaigns as a Public Health Crisis in Minneapolis.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of 3 Vaccine-Preventable Infectious Diseases Within US Immigration Detention Centers.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Review of Office of Inspector General Complaints Submitted by Individuals Held in ICE Detention.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Review
- The health-related experiences of detained immigrants with and without mental illness.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Setting the standards for safeguarding health and wellbeing in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concerns over health care in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities have grown over the past decade, including reports of medical mismanagement, inadequate mental health care, and inappropriate use of solitary confinement. Despite being a federally funded agency, reporting and accountability of health outcomes in ICE facilities is limited. This manuscript outlines current standards for health in ICE detention, how compliance is evaluated, why this process fails, and how current processes can be improved to achieve transparency and accountability. Ultimately, health metrics must be: 1) frequent; 2) timely; 3) granular; 4) collected by an independent body; and 5) publicly reported. Financial compensation for health service providers must be contingent on meeting these required metrics, with contract termination for persistent violations. Transparent and accountable monitoring systems, as are required in other federally funded healthcare facilities, are essential to accurately measure health outcomes and harms of individuals held in detention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.