ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
Knowledge graph construction for heart failure using large language models with prompt engineering.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Application scope of knowledge graphs in nursing: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Medical Device Risk Management: A New Paradigm Integrating Large Language Models and Prompt Engineering for Standard-Risk Knowledge Graph Construction and Application.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Enhanced Drug Repositioning Knowledge Extraction via Long Chain-of-Thought: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- A Prompt Engineering Method for Generating Emotional Images for Psychological Research.Affective science · 2025Article
- A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025Article
- Knowledge graph construction for intelligent cockpits based on large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Liver cancer knowledge graph construction based on dynamic entity replacement and masking strategies RoBERTa-wwm-large-BiLSTM-CRF model with clinical Chinese EMRs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Constructing an accurate and comprehensive knowledge graph of specific diseases is critical for practical clinical disease diagnosis and treatment, reasoning and decision support, rehabilitation, and health management. For knowledge graph construction tasks (such as named entity recognition, relation extraction), classical BERT-based methods require a large amount of training data to ensure model performance. However, real-world medical annotation data, especially disease-specific annotation samples, are very limited. In addition, existing models do not perform well in recognizing out-of-distribution entities and relations that are not seen in the training phase. Method: In this study, we present a novel and practical pipeline for constructing a heart failure knowledge graph using large language models and medical expert refinement. We apply prompt engineering to the three phases of schema design: schema design, information extraction, and knowledge completion. The best performance is achieved by designing task-specific prompt templates combined with the TwoStepChat approach. Results: Experiments on two datasets show that the TwoStepChat method outperforms the Vanillia prompt and outperforms the fine-tuned BERT-based baselines. Moreover, our method saves 65% of the time compared to manual annotation and is better suited to extract the out-of-distribution information in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.