ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
A spatial map: a propitious choice for constraining the binding problem.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Information Theory and the Phenomenal Binding Problem: Challenges and Solutions in a Dynamic Framework.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring neural architectures for simultaneously recognizing multiple visual attributes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Concept-Value Network as a Brain Model.NeuroSci · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have shown that the human visual system has two major functionally distinct cortical visual pathways: a ventral pathway, thought to be important for object recognition, and a dorsal pathway, thought to be important for spatial cognition. According to our and others previous studies, artificial neural networks with two segregated pathways can determine objects' identities and locations more accurately and efficiently than one-pathway artificial neural networks. In addition, we showed that these two segregated artificial cortical visual pathways can each process identity and spatial information of visual objects independently and differently. However, when using such networks to process multiple objects' identities and locations, a binding problem arises because the networks may not associate each object's identity with its location correctly. In a previous study, we constrained the binding problem by training the artificial identity pathway to retain relative location information of objects. This design uses a location map to constrain the binding problem. One limitation of that study was that we only considered two attributes of our objects (identity and location) and only one possible map (location) for binding. However, typically the brain needs to process and bind many attributes of an object, and any of these attributes could be used to constrain the binding problem. In our current study, using visual objects with multiple attributes (identity, luminance, orientation, and location) that need to be recognized, we tried to find the best map (among an identity map, a luminance map, an orientation map, or a location map) to constrain the binding problem. We found that in our experimental simulations, when visual attributes are independent of each other, a location map is always a better choice than the other kinds of maps examined for constraining the binding problem. Our findings agree with previous neurophysiological findings that show that the organization or map in many visual cortical areas is primarily retinotopic or spatial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.