Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015719›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

The potential of indocyanine green fluorescence detection in surgical cut margin of breast conserving surgery.

Hao Yu, Yuhao Yao, Tingting Zhu, Yulu Sun, Meng Zhang, Yin Zhang, Meng Cao, Weijie Zhang, Yongzhong Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hao Yu *Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuhao Yao *Department of Computer Science, Westcliff University, Irvine, CA, USA.
Tingting Zhu *Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yulu SunDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Meng ZhangDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yin ZhangDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Meng CaoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Weijie ZhangDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yongzhong YaoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is a cutting-edge technology that uses near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging to guide surgeons in surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye, which can be used for Methods: This was a non-randomized prospective cohort study. Data were collected between August 2021 and October 2022 in the Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University. Upon specimen removal, tumor margins were immediately analyzed by ICG fluorescence detection and then sent to the pathology department for intraoperative frozen section analysis and subsequent routine pathological examination. Abnormal margin rates were calculated and compared using intraoperative frozen section analysis and under the guidance of ICG fluorescence. Results: The study included 69 cases of breast cancer patients who underwent tumor resection assisted by ICG fluorescence-guided technology, including 18 patients with a 0.5 mg/kg dose and 51 patients with a 1.0 mg/kg dose. According to the study findings, the ICG test achieved a sensitivity of 81.82% and a specificity of 75.82%. At a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, the sensitivity was 66.67% whereas the specificity was 93.33%. At the dose of 1 mg/kg, the sensitivity was 87.5%, and the specificity was 74.42%. Similarly, for intraoperative frozen section analysis, the sensitivity was 81.82%, but the specificity was enhanced to 94.83%. Positive surgical cut margin was not identified in 2/69 by ICG fluorescence and frozen section analysis respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of ICG fluorescence detection is comparable to that of frozen section analysis, but the specificity is poor. The sensitivity increased and the specificity decreased at 1 mg/kg compared to the 0.5 mg/kg dose. ICG fluorescence can be used as a supplementary tool for frozen section analysis. These findings support further development and clinical performance assessment of ICG fluorescence.

Indexed as

breast-conserving surgery (BCS)fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS)indocyanine green (ICG)Near-infrared fluorescence (NIF)surgical safety margin

Identifiers

PMID39015719
PMCPMC11247585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.