ArticleGland surgery2024
Intracranial seeding of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a case report.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are predominantly benign, though a minority may exhibit invasive tendencies. A diagnosis of metastatic PitNETs, in the absence of malignant histology, hinges on the identification of craniospinal and/or systemic metastases. Only a minority of PitNETs exhibit intracranial seeding. Notably, craniotomy for PitNETs excision is a prominent catalyst for iatrogenic seeding. Case Description: This article presented a compelling case that 15 years following craniotomy for the resection of a somatotroph PitNET, a lesion emerged at the left frontal base within the ethmoid sinus. Subsequent post-operative pathology unveiled a mature plurihormonal pituitary specific transcription factor 1 (PIT-1)-lineage PitNET. Growth hormone (GH) levels decreased significantly from 22.8 ng/mL pre-operation to 2 ng/mL post-operative, and concurrently, prolactin (PRL) levels decreased from 26.7 ng/mL pre-operation to 4.5 ng/mL post-operation. Furthermore, in the follow-up examination conducted 5 months after the operation, both GH and PRL levels were found to be within the normal range for the patient. This robustly suggested that the initial surgical procedure played a key role in the development of the lesion. Conclusions: This underscores the paramount significance of strictly adhering to the non-tumor removal during craniotomy for PitNETs excision. Regardless of apparent complete resection on imaging, it remains imperative to conduct routine follow-up evaluations, encompassing both imaging studies and hormone level assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.