ArticleGland surgery2024
Risk factor analysis and clinical experience of treating capsular contracture after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beauty Under Pressure: The Impact of Hypertension on Outcomes in 54,000 Cases of Esthetic Breast Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Skin-and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction via Prepectoral Prosthesis Placement Approach and Lipofilling of the Skin Cover for Small- and Medium-Sized Breasts: A Retrospective Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Capsular contracture is one of the most common and severe complications after implant-based breast reconstruction. Recently, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become an alternative to subpectoral implant-based reconstruction. However, risk factors for capsular contracture associated with recent prepectoral reconstruction trends are not well refined yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine risk factors for capsular contracture, and share our experience of treating capsular contracture in prepectoral reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective comparative study focused on 110 patients who underwent prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with ADM. Risk factors of capsular contracture were analyzed by comparing a capsular contracture group (27 cases) and a non-capsular contracture group (83 cases). Secondary treatment after capsular contracture development was analyzed in capsular contracture group. Results: According to univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for capsular contracture, single staged implant-based reconstruction (direct-to-implant), infection, and postoperative radiotherapy were significantly related to the development of capsular contracture. Also, surgical intervention including capsulectomy and capsulotomy with implant change showed a significant higher remission rate than other groups. Conclusions: Our study provides insights into risk factors and treatment choices for capsular contracture after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with ADM. These findings can aid selection of patients, postoperative care and preventative treatment before reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.