Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.

Marina Pieri, Alessandro Ortalda, Savino Altizio, Luca Bertoglio, Pasquale Nardelli, Evgeny Fominskiy, Elisabetta Lapenna, Silvia Ajello, Anna Mara Scandroglio

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06964672 (Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06964672 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients: a Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversità Vita-Salute San RaffaeleRan2025 to 2030Enrolled150ConditionsHeart Failure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marina PieriDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro OrtaldaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Savino AltizioDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luca BertoglioSchool of Medicine, Brescia University School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy.
Pasquale NardelliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Evgeny FominskiyDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta LapennaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Silvia AjelloDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Anna Mara ScandroglioDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Impella 5.0 and 5.5 are promising low-invasive left ventricle (LV) temporary mechanical circulatory supports (tMCS) for cardiogenic shock due to LV mechanical unloading and are paired with powerful hemodynamic support. This study aimed to analyze data and destinies of patients supported with Impella 5.0/5.5 at a national referral center for cardiogenic shock and to assess the parameters associated with myocardial recovery and successful weaning. Methods: A single-center observational study was conducted on all patients treated with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 from March 2018 to July 2023. Results: A total of 59 patients underwent Impella 5.0/5.5 implantation due to profound cardiogenic shock, with acute myocardial infarction being the most frequent cause of shock (42 patients, 71%). The median duration of Impella support was 13 days (maximum duration of 52 days). Axillary cannulation was feasible in almost all patients, and 36% were mobilized during support. A total of 44 patients (75%) survived to the next therapy/recovery: 21 patients experienced recovery and 15 and 8 were bridged to long-term LVAD and heart transplantation, respectively. The global survival rate was 66%. The predictors of native heart recovery at multivariate analysis were the number of days on tMCS before upgrade to Impella 5.0/5.5 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (0.51-9) Conclusions: Transcatheter systems such as Impella 5.0/5.5 revolutionized the field of tMCS. Myocardial recovery is the primary clinical target. Its prognostication and promotion are key to ensure the most proficuous course for each patient from cardiogenic shock to long-term event-free survival.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockImpellaLVADmechanical circulatory supportmyocardial recovery

Identifiers

PMID39015682
PMCPMC11250607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.