ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06964672 (Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients: a Prospective Study
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and clinical outcomes of extended duration support in patients with Impella 5.5 - Analysis from the LOQI Registry.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Successful destination therapy after stepwise mechanical circulatory support in a patient with cardiogenic shock following mechanical aortic valve replacement.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Article
- Transaxillar Impella Implantation: Learning Curve Analysis and the Role of Mentorship in Accelerating Proficiency.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of prolonged microaxial flow pump support on outcomes in heart transplantation: A single-center experience.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Italian Context.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Article
- Assessing the clinical impact of cardiac intensivists in cardiac intensivecare units: results from the RESCUE registry.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Mechanical circulatory support as a cornerstone in advanced heart failure and transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Advancing LVAD Technology: Overcoming Challenges and Shaping the Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Impella 5.0 and 5.5 are promising low-invasive left ventricle (LV) temporary mechanical circulatory supports (tMCS) for cardiogenic shock due to LV mechanical unloading and are paired with powerful hemodynamic support. This study aimed to analyze data and destinies of patients supported with Impella 5.0/5.5 at a national referral center for cardiogenic shock and to assess the parameters associated with myocardial recovery and successful weaning. Methods: A single-center observational study was conducted on all patients treated with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 from March 2018 to July 2023. Results: A total of 59 patients underwent Impella 5.0/5.5 implantation due to profound cardiogenic shock, with acute myocardial infarction being the most frequent cause of shock (42 patients, 71%). The median duration of Impella support was 13 days (maximum duration of 52 days). Axillary cannulation was feasible in almost all patients, and 36% were mobilized during support. A total of 44 patients (75%) survived to the next therapy/recovery: 21 patients experienced recovery and 15 and 8 were bridged to long-term LVAD and heart transplantation, respectively. The global survival rate was 66%. The predictors of native heart recovery at multivariate analysis were the number of days on tMCS before upgrade to Impella 5.0/5.5 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (0.51-9) Conclusions: Transcatheter systems such as Impella 5.0/5.5 revolutionized the field of tMCS. Myocardial recovery is the primary clinical target. Its prognostication and promotion are key to ensure the most proficuous course for each patient from cardiogenic shock to long-term event-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.