ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2024
Unravelling the diagnostic pathology and molecular biomarkers in lung cancer.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning curve, safety and diagnostic yield of the GalaxyJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Consistency analysis of programmed cell death ligand-1/thyroid transcription factor-1 dual staining in malignant pleural effusion and lung adenocarcinoma histology specimens.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Urinary Volatilomic Signatures for Non-Invasive Detection of Lung Cancer: A HS-SPME/GC-MS Proof-of-Concept Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
- G-Quadruplex Conformational Switching for miR-155-3p Detection Using a Ligand-Based Fluorescence Approach.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- ERS Congress 2024: highlights from the Thoracic Oncology Assembly.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Lung cancer: an update on the multidisciplinary approach from screening to palliative care.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The progress in lung cancer treatment is closely interlinked with the progress in diagnostic methods. There are four steps before commencing lung cancer treatment: estimation of the patient's performance status, assessment of disease stage (tumour, node, metastasis), recognition of histological subtype, and detection of biomarkers. The resection rate in lung cancer is <30% and >70% of patients need systemic therapy, which is individually adjusted. Accurate histological diagnosis is very important and it is the basis of further molecular diagnosis. In many cases only small biopsy samples are available and the rules for their assessment are defined in this review. The use of immunochemistry with at least thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) and p40 is decisive in distinction between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Molecular diagnosis and detection of known driver mutations is necessary for introducing targeted therapy and use of multiplex gene panel assays using next-generation sequencing is recommended. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is the second promising method of systemic therapy with best results in tumours with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on cancer cells. Finally, the determination of a full tumour pattern will be possible using artificial intelligence in the near future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.