Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015528›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2024

Universal mental health training for frontline professionals: evaluation of pilot trial in Ukraine.

Viktoriia Gorbunova, Vitalii Klymchuk, Nataliia Portnytska, Olha Savychenko, Iryna Tychyna, Georges Steffgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viktoriia GorbunovaDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg District, L-4365, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9106-3589
Vitalii KlymchukDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg District, L-4365, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7898-5530
Nataliia PortnytskaSocio-Psychological Faculty, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyr Oblast, 10002, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-8356
Olha SavychenkoSocio-Psychological Faculty, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyr Oblast, 10002, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-9280
Iryna TychynaSocio-Psychological Faculty, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyr Oblast, 10002, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-4145
Georges SteffgenDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg District, L-4365, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0171-6786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing accessibility of mental health services and expanding universal health coverage is possible worldwide by using a task-shifting approach as partial delegation of some mental health support tasks to trained non-mental health service providers in order to use the available workforce more efficiently. The Universal Mental Health Training (UMHT), which is dedicated to this aim, was developed and piloted in Ukraine. The UMHT is an educational program for frontline professionals on high-quality and evidence-based responses to the mental health needs of the population they serve. Methods: The pilot trial of UMHTs' effectiveness was conducted with 307 frontline professionals divided into 24 training groups. The control group included 211 persons with the same occupation background who participated in training later (waiting list). All the groups took part in eight-hour training, which includes one introductory module that introduces the mental health topic alongside a five-step model of UMHT, two disorders-focused modules with the steps adjusted to work with specific disorders, and the final module that considers possible difficulties frontline professionals might experience. Three effectiveness measurements were used in the outcome assessment: readiness to interact with people with mental health issues at work, mental health awareness and mental health proficiency. Results: Analysis of the outcome data for the frontline professionals who underwent the UMHT revealed a moderate effect size related to the knowledge of mental health conditions, mental health awareness, and increasing the readiness to interact with people with mental health issues in comparison to the control group. Conclusions: High-level utilisation of the UMHT at work by trained professionals confirms the effectiveness of the developed intervention. Obtained results favour the continuation of the development of the UMHT and future implementation research in this field in Ukraine and potentially in other low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

frontline professionalsmental disordersmental healthmental health trainingtask-shifting approach

Identifiers

PMID39015528
PMCPMC11249520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.