ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
A Rapid Development of Post-Colonoscopy Appendicitis within Twelve Hours: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colon cancer has seen a steady decline in incidence due to increased colonoscopy use. We can assume that this increased use, results in a higher incidence of post-colonoscopy complications such postpolypectomy syndrome, perforation and post-colonoscopy appendicitis (PCA). In this report, we present a case of PCA presenting to the emergency department within 12 h of a screening colonoscopy. Case Presentation: Our patient, a 77-year-old male, underwent an uncomplicated screening colonoscopy and was discharged home after briefly being monitored without any complaints. Later that day, the patient presented to the emergency department complaining of acute generalized abdominal pain. On presentation, the patient was found to be hypertensive and febrile with a distended abdomen with right lower quadrant tenderness on examination. Laboratory investigations noted an elevated white blood cell count with no evidence of acute appendicitis or focal inflammatory changes on contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic computer tomography. The patient was subsequently admitted and developed worsening right lower quadrant abdominal pain and distention overnight. Due to this worsening clinical condition, the decision was made to proceed with a diagnostic laparoscopy. After frank pus was found laparoscopically around the cecum and appendix, it was then converted to an exploratory laparotomy. Subsequently, a perforated gangrenous appendix was found with an erythematous and indurated cecum. Conclusion: Major complications of colonoscopy can include perforation and/or post-colonoscopy bleeding which have been shown to have a respective incidence of 0.21% and 0.1%. With the anticipated rise in the number of colonoscopies, much rarer complications such as PCA with an incidence of less than 0.05% will be seen more frequently. Due to its nonspecific presentation, it is necessary for providers to consider PCA as an important differential for all patients presenting with abdominal pain after a colonoscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.