Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015463›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2024

The anatomic repair of recurrent aortic arch obstruction in children and adolescents.

Michaela Kreuzer, Eva Sames-Dolzer, Melanie Klapper, Andreas Tulzer, Roland Mair, Fabian Seeber, Gregor Gierlinger, Dalibor Saric, Rudolf Mair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michaela KreuzerDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Eva Sames-DolzerDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Melanie KlapperDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Andreas TulzerMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Roland MairDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Fabian SeeberDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Gregor GierlingerDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Dalibor SaricDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Klinički Bolnički Centar Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Rudolf MairDivision of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Surgery for recurrent aortic arch obstruction is highly challenging and publications are rare. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to evaluate mortality, complications, and reintervention rate after an anatomic repair. Methods: Between 1999 and 2022, in total 946 operations on the aortic arch were performed at the Children's Heart Center Linz. In 39 cases, the indication was a recurrent or residual aortic arch obstruction or coarctation in a patient aged 18 years or younger. This is our study cohort. The aorta was reconstructed by a direct anastomosis/autograft in 20 patients, patch in 17 patients, and interposition graft in 2 adolescents. In 32 procedures, cardiopulmonary bypass with whole body perfusion was employed, in 4, antegrade cerebral perfusion was employed, in 2, a left heart bypass was employed, and in 1 no cardiopulmonary bypass was used. Results: Median (Q1, Q3) age at operation was 253 days (100, 2198 days), weight 7.5 kg (4.5, 17.8 kg). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 177 minutes (115, 219 minutes), crossclamp time 73 minutes (49, 102 minutes). Three infants died during the hospital stay: 1 with Williams syndrome, 1 with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and 1 with heterotaxia. There was no death due to an arch complication. The main complications were 1 neurologic injury after postoperative resuscitation (Williams syndrome) and 1 permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. During the follow-up period of median 8.1 years (2.6, 12 years) 1 re-reintervention on the aortic arch was necessary. Conclusions: Sophisticated reoperations on the aortic arch could be performed safely. In children, the growth potential of all segments of the aorta could be sustainably preserved by avoiding interposition or extra-anatomic bypass grafts.

Indexed as

aortic arch reconstructionhypoplastic aortic archrecoarctationrecurrent aortic arch obstruction

Identifiers

PMID39015463
PMCPMC11247212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.