ArticleCase reports in dermatology
Lupus Erythematosus Tumidus Misdiagnosed as Erythema Nodosum from Coccidioidomycosis.
Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is a rare photosensitive dermatosis that is categorized as intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It shares clinical similarities and histopathological features with other skin disorders, such as erythema nodosum, lymphocytic infiltrate of Jessner, and reticular erythematous mucinosis, thus making diagnosis quite challenging. We present a patient with LET whose diagnosis was confirmed after seeing several doctors. Case Presentation: A 52-year-old Hispanic female presented with tender erythematous nodules on her thighs for approximately 1 month. She was suspected of having erythema nodosum secondary to coccidioidomycosis and was prescribed fluconazole 200 mg for 30 days but showed no improvement. However, histopathological and direct immunofluorescence tests later confirmed a diagnosis of LET. The patient was treated with hydroxychloroquine, and the lesions improved remarkably after 2 weeks. Conclusion: LET is a rare dermatosis that closely resembles other dermatologic conditions such as erythema nodosum, lymphocytic infiltrate of Jessner, and reticular erythematous mucinosis. Diagnosis based on clinical features alone should be avoided, and ideally, treatment should only be initiated after confirmatory histopathological testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.