ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Obstructive or non-obstructive megacystis: a prenatal dilemma.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early diagnosis and intervention in congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: time to revise our approach?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosis of prenatal megacystis has a significant impact on the pregnancy, as it can have severe adverse effects on fetal and neonatal survival and renal and pulmonary function. The study aims to investigate the natural history of fetal megacystis, to try to differentiate Materials and methods: A retrospective single-center observational study was conducted from July 2015 to November 2023. The inclusion criteria were a longitudinal bladder diameter (LBD) >7 mm in the first trimester or an overdistended/thickened-walled bladder failing to empty in the second and third trimesters. Close ultrasound follow-up, multidisciplinary prenatal counseling, and invasive and non-invasive genetic tests were offered. Informed consent for fetal autopsy was obtained in cases of termination of pregnancy or intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD). Following birth, neonates were followed up at the same center. Patients were stratified based on diagnosis: LUTO (G1), urogenital anomalies other than LUTO ("non-LUTO") (G2), and normal urinary tract (G3). Results: This study included 27 fetuses, of whom 26 were males. Megacystis was diagnosed during the second and third trimesters in 92% of the fetuses. Of the 27 fetuses, 3 (11.1%) underwent an abortion, and 1 had IUFD. Twenty-three newborns were live births (85%) at a mean gestational age (GA) of 34 ± 2 weeks. Two patients (neonates) died postnatally due to severe associated malformations. Several prenatal parameters were evaluated to differentiate patients with LUTO from those with non-LUTO, including the severity of upper tract dilatation, keyhole sign, oligohydramnios, LBD, and GA at diagnosis. However, none proved predictive of the postnatal diagnosis. Similarly, none of the prenatal parameters evaluated were predictive of postnatal renal function. Discussion: The diagnosis of megacystis in the second and third trimesters was associated with live births in up to 85% of cases, with LUTO identified as the main cause of fetal megacystis. This potentially more favorable outcome, compared to the majority reported in literature, should be taken into account in prenatal counseling. Megacystis is an often misinterpreted antennal sign that may hide a wide range of diagnoses with different prognoses, beyond an increased risk of adverse renal and respiratory outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.