ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2024
Prospective Role of Foundation Models in Advancing Autonomous Vehicles.
Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Controlled Scenarios to the Real World: Cross-Domain Degradation Pattern Matching for All-in-One Image Restoration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Multi-horizon flight trajectory prediction enabled by time-frequency wavelet transform.Nature communications · 2025Article
- From Concept to Representation: Modeling Driving Capability and Task Demand with a Multimodal Large Language Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-Scale Oriented Detection with Shared Convolution for UAV-Enabled Maritime Safety Surveillance.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Analyzing Mega-mobility Systems in Smart Cities: A Macro-Micro Integration with Feedback Paradigm Empowered by Artificial Intelligence.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Orchestrating Embodied Systems through the Embodied Context Protocol: Motivation, Progress, and Directions.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence and breakthroughs in deep learning, large-scale foundation models (FMs), such as generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), Sora, etc., have achieved remarkable results in many fields including natural language processing and computer vision. The application of FMs in autonomous driving holds considerable promise. For example, they can contribute to enhancing scene understanding and reasoning. By pre-training on rich linguistic and visual data, FMs can understand and interpret various elements in a driving scene, and provide cognitive reasoning to give linguistic and action instructions for driving decisions and planning. Furthermore, FMs can augment data based on the understanding of driving scenarios to provide feasible scenes of those rare occurrences in the long tail distribution that are unlikely to be encountered during routine driving and data collection. The enhancement can subsequently lead to improvement in the accuracy and reliability of autonomous driving systems. Another testament to the potential of FMs' applications lies in world models, exemplified by the DREAMER series, which showcases the ability to comprehend physical laws and dynamics. Learning from massive data under the paradigm of self-supervised learning, world models can generate unseen yet plausible driving environments, facilitating the enhancement in the prediction of road users' behaviors and the off-line training of driving strategies. In this paper, we synthesize the applications and future trends of FMs in autonomous driving. By utilizing the powerful capabilities of FMs, we strive to tackle the potential issues stemming from the long-tail distribution in autonomous driving, consequently advancing overall safety in this domain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.