ArticleCase reports in surgery2024
Radiation-Induced Low-Grade Glioma following Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Scalp: Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation-induced gliomas (RIGs) were reported in the literature in general. In most of the reported cases and the reviewed articles, patients have a history of primary intracranial tumors like craniopharyngioma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma, and the commonly resulting secondary tumors are meningiomas and sarcomas, mainly not gliomas. Conclusion: In conclusion, the way that this condition manifested in our case is considered rare due to old age and the low doses of radiation received. Despite being an important part to confirm the diagnosis, genetic studies were unfortunately not done in our case, but we mainly based on the criteria mentioned by Cahan et al., which are mainly taken from the clinical history and histopathology. Here, we present an example of considering such a diagnosis when suspected clinically, but a genetic study for confirmation should be thought of even if it is not available in the locality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.