ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Texture perception at the foot sole: comparison between walking, sitting, and to the hand.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We frequently interact with textured surfaces with both our feet and hands. Like texture's importance for grasping, texture perception via the foot sole might provide important signals about the stability of a surface, aiding in maintaining balance. However, how textures are perceived by the foot, and especially under the high forces experienced during walking, is unknown. The current study builds on extensive research investigating texture perception at the hand by presenting everyday textures to the foot while stepping onto them, exploring them with the foot while sitting, and exploring them with the hand. Participants rated each texture along three perceptual dimensions: roughness, hardness, and stickiness. Participants also rated how stable their posture felt when standing upon each texture. Results show that perceptual ratings of each textural dimension were highly correlated across conditions. Hardness exhibited the greatest consistency and stickiness the weakest. Moreover, correlations between stepping and exploration with the foot were lower than those between exploration with the foot and exploration with the hand, suggesting that mode of interaction (high vs. low force) impacts perception more than body region used (foot vs. hand). On an individual level, correlations between conditions were higher than those between participants, suggesting that differences are greater between individuals than between mode of interaction or body region. When investigating the relationship to perceived stability, only hardness contributed significantly, with harder surfaces rated as more stable. Overall, tactile perception appears consistent across body regions and interaction modes, although differences in perception are greater during walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.