Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39015056›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Achieving high accuracy in meniscus tear detection using advanced deep learning models with a relatively small data set.

Erdal Güngör, Husam Vehbi, Ahmetcan Cansın, Mehmet Batu Ertan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Achieving high accuracy in meniscus tear detection using advanced deep learning models with a relatively small data set.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erdal GüngörDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medipol University Esenler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-2166
Husam VehbiDepartment of Radiology, Medipol University Esenler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-3768
Ahmetcan CansınInternational School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1484-4370
Mehmet Batu ErtanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-9967

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced deep learning models, specifically YOLOv8 and EfficientNetV2, in detecting meniscal tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a relatively small data set.

methodOur data set consisted of MRI studies from 642 knees-two orthopaedic surgeons labelled and annotated the MR images. The training pipeline included MRI scans of these knees. It was divided into two stages: initially, a deep learning algorithm called YOLO was employed to identify the meniscus location, and subsequently, the EfficientNetV2 deep learning architecture was utilized to detect meniscal tears. A concise report indicating the location and detection of a torn meniscus is provided at the end.

resultThe YOLOv8 model achieved mean average precision at 50% threshold (mAP@50) scores of 0.98 in the sagittal view and 0.985 in the coronal view. Similarly, the EfficientNetV2 model obtained area under the curve scores of 0.97 and 0.98 in the sagittal and coronal views, respectively. These outstanding results demonstrate exceptional performance in meniscus localization and tear detection.

conclusionDespite a relatively small data set, state-of-the-art models like YOLOv8 and EfficientNetV2 yielded promising results. This artificial intelligence system enhances meniscal injury diagnosis by generating instant structured reports, facilitating faster image interpretation and reducing physician workload. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingTibial Meniscus InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansMaledeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingmeniscus tear detectionobject detectionYOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID39015056
PMCPMC11792105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.