ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Incidental Diagnosis of Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma During Liver Transplantation Surgery: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delayed Diagnosis of Peritoneal Mesothelioma in Recurrent Ascites: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, lethal tumor of serous membranes. The most common factor reported in association with MPM is asbestos exposure, while viral infections, genetic predisposition, paraneoplastic syndrome, and altered immunity have been described as well. The diagnosis can be challenging among those with lower tumor burden as well as nonspecific symptoms, and it is not unusual to discover the diagnosis incidentally. CASE REPORT A middle-aged woman with decompensated cirrhosis underwent extensive pre-transplant workup, showing no evidence of malignancy. She had a personal history of asbestos exposure and family history of MPM in the extended family. During transplant surgery, a few peritoneal nodules were noted, leading to termination of the procedure. Pathological analysis confirmed malignant MPM. A multidisciplinary discussion led to following a conservative treatment approach without any intervention, due to higher risk of worsening hepatic decompensation associated with peritonectomy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The patient's hepatic decompensation resolved 6 months after the aborted liver transplant operation. Since the diagnosis of MPM, positron emission tomography scans have shown no recurrence of MPM for 3 consecutive years. CONCLUSIONS This is the first case of MPM diagnosed incidentally during a liver transplantation surgery. This case highlights the challenges in the diagnosis and management of MPM in a patient with decompensated liver disease. A multidisciplinary approach and following a consensus decision led to prolonged survival in the described patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.