Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014494›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2024

Improving quality through simulation; developing guidance to design simulation interventions following key events in healthcare.

Cristina Diaz-Navarro, Bridie Jones, Gethin Pugh, Michael Moneypenny, Marc Lazarovici, David J Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina Diaz-NavarroHealth Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK. cristina.diaz-navarro@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-9060
Bridie JonesHealth Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Gethin PughHealth Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Michael MoneypennyClinical Skills Managed Educational Network, NHS Education for Scotland, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1015-4467
Marc LazaroviciInstitut Für Notfallmedizin Und Medizinmanagement (INM), LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-810X
David J GrantSESAM - Society for Simulation in Europe, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-1498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation educators are often requested to provide multidisciplinary and/or interprofessional simulation training in response to critical incidents. Current perspectives on patient safety focus on learning from failure, success and everyday variation. An international collaboration has led to the development of an accessible and practical framework to guide the implementation of appropriate simulation-based responses to clinical events, integrating quality improvement, simulation and patient safety methodologies to design appropriate and impactful responses. In this article, we describe a novel five-step approach to planning simulation-based interventions after any events that might prompt simulation-based learning in healthcare environments. This approach guides teams to identify pertinent events in healthcare, involve relevant stakeholders, agree on appropriate change interventions, elicit how simulation can contribute to them and share the learning without aggravating the second victim phenomenon. The framework is underpinned by Deming's System of Profound Knowledge, the Model for Improvement and translational simulation. It aligns with contemporary socio-technical models in healthcare, by emphasising the role of clinical teams in designing adaptation and change for improvement, as well as encouraging collaborations to enhance patient safety in healthcare. For teams to achieve this adaptive capacity that realises organisational goals of continuous learning and improvement requires the breaking down of historical silos through the creation of an infrastructure that formalises relationships between service delivery, safety management, quality improvement and education. This creates opportunities to learn by design, rather than chance, whilst striving to close gaps between work as imagined and work as done.

Indexed as

Critical incidentKey eventPatient safetyQuality improvementSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39014494
PMCPMC11253482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.