ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2024
NTRK-fused central nervous system tumours: clinicopathological and genetic insights and response to TRK inhibitors.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-TRK expression and NTRK gene aberrations in meningiomas: association with tumor grade and proliferative activity.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
- Fundamentals and emerging frontiers in p53-targeted drug development.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- TRK inhibitors in pediatric gliomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Cancer Neuroscience: Linking Neuronal Plasticity with Brain Tumor Growth and Resistance.Biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Glioblastoma,Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Adult Low-Grade Glioma WithCase reports in pathology · 2026Article
- Sustained response to larotrectinib in a pediatric patient with recurrent STRN3::NTRK2 fusion-positive pilocytic astrocytoma.CNS oncology · 2025Article
- Advanced Neuroimaging and Emerging Systemic Therapies in Glioblastoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- TRK Inhibitors in Adult and Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Primary pancreas NTRK-rearranged neoplasm harboring an EVT6::NTRK3 fusion with a sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma morphology: a case report and comprehensive review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Genomic Profiling in Glioma Patients to Explore Clinically Relevant Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evolution of Molecular Biomarkers and Precision Molecular Therapeutic Strategies in Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review
- Insights into an uncommon brain tumor with NTRK gene fusion: Glioneuronal tumor with ATRX alteration, kinase fusion, and anaplastic features.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Perineuronal net degradation in aggressive glioblastomas withNeuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are found in 1% of gliomas across children and adults. TRK inhibitors are promising therapeutic agents for NTRK-fused gliomas because they are tissue agnostic and cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Methods We investigated twelve NGS-verified NTRK-fused gliomas from a single institute, Seoul National University Hospital. Results The patient cohort included six children (aged 1-15 years) and six adults (aged 27-72 years). NTRK2 fusions were found in ten cerebral diffuse low-grade and high-grade gliomas (DLGGs and DHGGs, respectively), and NTRK1 fusions were found in one cerebral desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma and one spinal DHGG. In this series, the fusion partners of NTRK2 were HOOK3, KIF5A, GKAP1, LHFPL3, SLMAP, ZBTB43, SPECC1L, FKBP15, KANK1, and BCR, while the NTRK1 fusion partners were TPR and TPM3. DLGGs tended to harbour only an NTRK fusion, while DHGGs exhibited further genetic alterations, such as TERT promoter/TP53/PTEN mutation, CDKN2A/2B homozygous deletion, PDGFRA/KIT/MDM4/AKT3 amplification, or multiple chromosomal copy number aberrations. Four patients received adjuvant TRK inhibitor therapy (larotrectinib, repotrectinib, or entrectinib), among which three also received chemotherapy (n = 2) or proton therapy (n = 1). The treatment outcomes for patients receiving TRK inhibitors varied: one child who received larotrectinib for residual DLGG maintained stable disease. In contrast, another child with DHGG in the spinal cord experienced multiple instances of tumour recurrence. Despite treatment with larotrectinib, ultimately, the child died as a result of tumour progression. An adult patient with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with entrectinib also experienced tumour progression and eventually died. However, there was a successful outcome for a paediatric patient with DHGG who, after a second gross total tumour removal followed by repotrectinib treatment, showed no evidence of disease. This patient had previously experienced relapse after the initial surgery and underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell therapy with carboplatin/thiotepa and proton therapy. Conclusions Our study clarifies the distinct differences in the pathology and TRK inhibitor response between LGG and HGG with NTRK fusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.