Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014428›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Statistical analysis plan for cluster randomised trial to evaluate a community-level complementary food safety and hygiene and nutrition intervention in Mali: the MaaCiwara study.

Laura Quinn, James Martin, Evans Asamane, Semira Manaseki-Holland, Richard J Lilford, Lacina Traore, Jacqueline Thompson, Samuel I Watson, Karla Hemming

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura QuinnInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. l.quinn@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-4631
James MartinInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Evans AsamaneInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard J LilfordInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lacina TraoreInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jacqueline ThompsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Samuel I WatsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council (MRC), UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) MR/T030011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrheal disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in under-fives in many low- and middle-income countries. Changes in food safety, hygiene practices, and nutrition around the weaning period may reduce the risk of disease and improve infant development. The MaaCiwara study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based educational intervention designed to improve food safety and hygiene behaviours, as well as child nutrition. This update article describes the statistical analysis plan for the MaaCiwara study in detail. METHODS AND

designThe MaaCiwara study is a parallel group, two-arm, superiority cluster randomised controlled trial with baseline measures, involving 120 clusters of rural and urban communities. These clusters are randomised to either receive the community-based behaviour change intervention or to the control group. The study participants will be mother-child pairs, with children aged between 6 and 36 months. Data collection involves a day of observation and interviews with each participating mother-child pair, conducted at baseline, 4 months, and 15 months post-intervention. The primary analysis aims to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention on changes to complementary food safety and preparation behaviours, food and water contamination, and diarrhoea. The primary outcomes will be analysed generalised linear mixed models, at individual level, accounting for clusters and rural/urban status to estimate the difference in outcomes between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes include maternal autonomy, enteric infection, nutrition, child anthropometry, and development scores. In addition, structural equation analysis will be conducted to examine the causal relationships between the different outcomes.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) register: ISRCTN14390796 . Registered on 13 December 2021.

Indexed as

Food SafetyHygieneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicChild, PreschoolData Interpretation, StatisticalDiarrheaEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleMaliNutritional StatusCluster randomised controlled trialFood safety and hygieneStatistical analysis plan

Identifiers

PMID39014428
PMCPMC11253307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.