Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014418›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

The usefulness of ultrasonography as a dynamic measurement system for visualizing root canal working length: an in vivo study.

İrem Eren, Yeşim Deniz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

İrem ErenDentistry Faculty, Department of Endodontics, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-8137
Yeşim DenizDentistry Faculty, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Sahil Yolu Street, No:5, Çanakkale, 17100, Turkey. yesimdeniz@comu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6967-5378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough apex locators are generally effective tools for determining root canal working length, they may produce inaccurate results in some cases. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography as an alternative method for measuring root canal length. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-seven anterior teeth with apical lesions were selected for the study. Initially, an electronic apex locator was used to measure the working length. Subsequently, ultrasonography was employed to visualize the root apex and determine the working length. During ultrasound imaging, a K-file No. 15 was inserted into the root canal until its tip was visible on the ultrasound monitor. Measurements obtained from both methods were compared using an independent sample t-test. Correlations were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and agreement was determined using the Bland‒Altman plot.

resultsThe mean working canal length was 19.9 mm for the apex locator and 20.6 mm for the ultrasonography-guided method. No significant differences were observed between the data obtained using the apex locator method and the data obtained using the ultrasonography guidance method. Furthermore, a high level of agreement was identified between the two techniques.

conclusionUltrasonography can be used to visualize the apex effectively and determine canal length, especially when canal length determination is uncertain for various reasons.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityOdontometryRoot Canal PreparationTooth ApexAdultHumansIncisorUltrasonographyRoot canal preparationTooth apexUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39014418
PMCPMC11251373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.