Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014417›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

ARDSFlag: an NLP/machine learning algorithm to visualize and detect high-probability ARDS admissions independent of provider recognition and billing codes.

Amir Gandomi, Phil Wu, Daniel R Clement, Jinyan Xing, Rachel Aviv, Matthew Federbush, Zhiyong Yuan, Yajun Jing, Guangyao Wei, Negin Hajizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal Deep Learning for ARDS Detection.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amir GandomiFrank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA. amir.gandomi@hofstra.edu.
Phil WuAiD Technologies, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Daniel R ClementDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Jinyan XingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Rachel AvivKaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Matthew FederbushDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Zhiyong YuanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yajun JingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Guangyao WeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Negin HajizadehInstitute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the significance and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its detection remains highly variable and inconsistent. In this work, we aim to develop an algorithm (ARDSFlag) to automate the diagnosis of ARDS based on the Berlin definition. We also aim to develop a visualization tool that helps clinicians efficiently assess ARDS criteria.

methodsARDSFlag applies machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to evaluate Berlin criteria by incorporating structured and unstructured data in an electronic health record (EHR) system. The study cohort includes 19,534 ICU admissions in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The output is the ARDS diagnosis, onset time, and severity.

resultsARDSFlag includes separate text classifiers trained using large training sets to find evidence of bilateral infiltrates in radiology reports (accuracy of 91.9%±0.5%) and heart failure/fluid overload in radiology reports (accuracy 86.1%±0.5%) and echocardiogram notes (accuracy 98.4%±0.3%). A test set of 300 cases, which was blindly and independently labeled for ARDS by two groups of clinicians, shows that ARDSFlag generates an overall accuracy of 89.0% (specificity = 91.7%, recall = 80.3%, and precision = 75.0%) in detecting ARDS cases.

conclusionTo our best knowledge, this is the first study to focus on developing a method to automate the detection of ARDS. Some studies have developed and used other methods to answer other research questions. Expectedly, ARDSFlag generates a significantly higher performance in all accuracy measures compared to those methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingRespiratory Distress SyndromeFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)Berlin criteriaLarge language models (LLM)Machine learningNatural language processing (NLP)

Identifiers

PMID39014417
PMCPMC11250933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.