Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014410›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2024

Optimization of micelle-encapsulated extremely small sized iron oxide nanoparticles as a T1 contrast imaging agent: biodistribution and safety profile.

Minseok Suh, Ji Yong Park, Guen Bae Ko, Ji Yoon Kim, Do Won Hwang, Louis Rees, Gillian E Conway, Shareen H Doak, Hyelim Kang, Nohyun Lee and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Minseok Suh *Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yong Park *Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Guen Bae KoMedical Research Center, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yoon KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Do Won HwangResearch and Development Center, THERABEST Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.
Louis ReesIn Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Gillian E ConwayIn Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Shareen H DoakIn Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Hyelim KangSchool of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
Nohyun LeeSchool of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
Taeghwan HyeonCenter for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul, Korea.
Yun-Sang LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. wonza43@snu.ac.kr.
Dong Soo LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. dsl@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A2C2101069National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1F1A1064340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) have been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for various clinical applications, such as tumor-targeted imaging, hyperthermia therapy, drug delivery, and live-cell tracking. However, the application of IONPs as T1 contrast agents has been restricted due to their high r2 values and r2/r1 ratios, which limit their effectiveness in T1 contrast enhancement. Notably, IONPs with diameters smaller than 5 nm, referred to as extremely small-sized IONPs (ESIONs), have demonstrated potential in overcoming these limitations. To advance the clinical application of ESIONs as T1 contrast agents, we have refined a scale-up process for micelle encapsulation aimed at improving the hydrophilization of ESIONs, and have carried out comprehensive in vivo biodistribution and preclinical toxicity assessments.

resultsThe optimization of the scale-up micelle-encapsulation process, specifically employing Tween60 at a concentration of 10% v/v, resulted in ESIONs that were uniformly hydrophilized, with an average size of 9.35 nm and a high purification yield. Stability tests showed that these ESIONs maintained consistent size over extended storage periods and dispersed effectively in blood and serum-mimicking environments. Relaxivity measurements indicated an r1 value of 3.43 mM

conclusionsThis study effectively optimized a scale-up process for the micelle encapsulation of ESIONs, leading to the production of hydrophilic ESIONs at gram-scale levels. These optimized ESIONs showcased properties conducive to T1 contrast imaging, such as elevated r1 relaxivity and a reduced r2/r1 ratio. Biodistribution study underscored their prolonged bloodstream presence and efficient clearance through the liver and bile, without significant renal involvement. The preclinical toxicity tests affirmed the safety of the ESIONs, supporting their potential use as T1 contrast agent with versatile clinical application.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicellesParticle SizeAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiceRatsTissue DistributionContrast MediaMicellesESIONsIron oxide nanoparticleMicelle encapsulationMRIT1 contrast

Identifiers

PMID39014410
PMCPMC11253436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.