ArticleBMC oral health2024
The damage and remineralization strategies of dental hard tissues following radiotherapy.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of fractionated therapeutic radiotherapy on surface microhardness and roughness of giomer- and ormocer-based restorative composites: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Protective and remineralizing capacity of biosilicate, chitosan-based material, and fluoride on demineralized and irradiated enamel.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2026Article
- The reinforcing effect of anti-caries treatments on acidic challenge resistance of irradiated enamel.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of gamma radiation on human enamel chemical and physical properties.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Detection of proximal dental caries in primary teeth with a near-infrared-irradiation-assisted intraoral scanner: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparison of TiF4, CPP-ACP, and NaF in preventing demineralization in irradiated bovine enamel and dentin in vitro.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2025Article
- Natural Strategies for Dental Hard-Tissue Remineralization: A Scoping Review of Galla Chinensis and Its Dual Anticaries Action.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Review
- Effect of a 1.1% NaF toothpaste containing Sr/F-doped bioactive glass on irradiated demineralized dentin: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study pursued two main purposes. The first aim was to expound on the microscopic factors of radiation-related caries (RRC). Further, it aimed to compare the remineralization effect of different remineralizing agents on demineralized teeth after radiotherapy.
methodsThe enamel and dentin samples of bovine teeth were irradiated with different doses of radiation. After analysis of scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-Ray diffraction (XRD), and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), the samples irradiated with 50 Gy radiation were selected and divided into the demineralization group, the double distilled water (DDW) group, the Sodium fluoride (NaF) group, the Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) group, the NaF + CPP-ACP group, and the Titanium tetrafluoride (TiF
resultsA radiation dose of 30 Gy was sufficient to cause damage to the dentinal tubules, but 70 Gy radiation had little effect on the microstructure of enamel. Additionally, the NaF + CPP-ACP group and the TiF
conclusionsRadiation causes more significant damage to dentin compared to enamel. NaF + CPP-ACP and TiF ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This in vitro study contributes to determining a safer radiation dose range for teeth and identifying the most effective remineralization approach for RRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.