ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
A new technique to implant intracorneal ring-segments from the perilimbal region: one-year prospective pilot study report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently a new surgical technique for intracorneal ring-segments (ICRS) assisted by femtosecond laser (FSL) called ByLimB was developed, involving the creation of the incision from a paralimbic region. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ByLimb technique following one year of follow-up.
methodsA prospective, single-center study was conducted at the Zaldivar Institute in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Keratoconus patients with indication for ICRS-FSL assisted procedure, operated with the ByLimb technique were included. By using the ByLimb technique, the ICRS are placed without affecting the tunnel's roof, and the end of the ICRS is always away from the incision area. Visual acuity, topographic astigmatism, and the occurrence of complications were evaluated. Safety index was the main outcome and efficacy indes was a complimentary outcome.
resultsA total of 17 eyes completed the 12-month follow-up period. The safety index was 1.10 (mean postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in decimal: 0.76/preoperative CDVA: 0.69), while the efficacy index was 0.89 (mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity UDVA in decimal: 0.62/preoperative CDVA: 0.69). Mean preoperative astigmatism was 5.3 ± 2.3, decreasing twelve months after surgery at 2.1 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). No eye loss lines of vision and no intraoperative complications were observed. During the first month after surgery, an improper positioning of the ICRS based on topographic assessment was detected in five cases. A second procedure was performed, which consisted of opening the incision and introducing a Sinsky hook, through which the ICRS was mobilized and placed in its correct position. No incisional alterations, signs of infection, anterior segment anomalies, or fundus alterations were observed.
conclusionFSL-assisted ICRS implantation through the perilimbal region has demonstrated an adequate safety index one year post-surgery. Additionally, this technique has facilitated accurate realignment of ICRS during secondary surgical interventions within one-month post-surgery. While the current findings are promising, continued follow-up of these cases is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.