ArticleBMC immunology2024
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients: a study from Iran.
Article in BMC immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders: an ERS Clinical Research Collaboration.The European respiratory journal · 2026Guideline
- Demographic, clinical, and immunological features in combined immunodeficiency patients: a comparative analysis of those with and without pulmonary manifestations - a multicenter study from Iran.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is a prevalent complication in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and is often related to other characteristics such as bronchiectasis and autoimmunity. Because the term ILD encompasses a variety of acute and chronic pulmonary conditions, diagnosis is usually based on imaging features. Histopathology is less available. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the ILD in patients with CVID. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, sixty CVID patients who referred to the pulmonology and immunodeficiency clinics of Mofid Children's Hospital between 2013 and 2022 were included. The diagnosis of ILD were based on transbronchial lung biopsy (TBB) or clinical and radiological symptoms. The prevalence of ILD in CVID patients was determined. Also, the CVID patients with and without ILD were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical, laboratory and radiologic findings.
resultsAmong all patients, ten patients had ILD (16.6%). In terms of laboratory parameters, there was a significant difference between platelets in the two groups of CVID patients with and without ILD, and the level of platelets was higher in the group of patients with ILD. Moreover, in terms of clinical symptoms, pneumonia, diarrhea and hepatomegaly were significantly different between the two groups and were statistically higher in the group of patients with ILD (P < 0.05). Autoimmunity and malignancy were not significantly different in two groups. There was a significant difference in, hyperinflation between the two groups of CVID patients with and without ILD, and the frequency of, hyperinflation was higher in the patients without ILD (P = 0.040).
conclusionUnderstanding the pathogenesis of ILD plays an essential role in revealing non-infectious pulmonary complications that occur in CVID patients. Increasing efforts to understand ILD not only shed light on its hidden pathogenesis and clinical features, but also enhance our understanding of CVID in a broader sense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.