Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014306›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Acute frailty services: results of a national day of care survey.

Vicky Kamwa, Thomas Knight, Catherine Atkin, Tim Cooksley, Chris Subbe, Mark Holland, Daniel Lasserson, Elizabeth Sapey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vicky Kamwa *Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, NIHR Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Thomas Knight *Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, NIHR Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England. Thomasknight@nhs.net.
Catherine AtkinBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, NIHR Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Tim CooksleyThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.
Chris SubbeSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales.
Mark HollandSchool of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bolton, Bolton, England.
Daniel LassersonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Elizabeth SapeyBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, NIHR Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder people living with frailty are at high risk of emergency hospital admission and often have complex care needs which may not be adequately met by conventional models of acute care. This has driven the introduction of adaptations to acute care pathways designed to improve outcomes in this patient group. The identification of differences in the organisational approach to frailty may highlight opportunities for quality improvement.

methodsThe Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking audit is a national service evaluation which uses a single day-of-care methodology to record patient and organisational level data. All acute hospitals in the United Kingdom are eligible to participate. Emergency admissions referred to acute medical services between 00:00 and 23:59 on Thursday 23rd June 2022 were recorded. Information on the structure and operational design of acute frailty services was collected. The use of a validated frailty assessment tool, clinical frailty scale within the first 24 h of admission, assessment by an acute frailty service and clinical outcomes were reported in patients aged 70 year and above. A mixed effect generalised linear model was used to determine factors associated same-day discharge without overnight stay in patients with frailty.

resultsA total of 152 hospitals participated. There was significant heterogeneity in the operational design and staffing model of acute frailty services. The presence of an acute frailty unit was reported in 57 (42.2%) hospitals. The use of validated frailty assessment tools was reported in 117 (90.0%) hospitals, of which 107 (91.5%) used the clinical frailty scale. Patient-level data were recorded for 3604 patients aged 70 years and above. At the patient level, 1626 (45.1%) were assessed using a validated tool during the admission process. Assessment by acute frailty services was associated with an increased likelihood of same-day discharge (adjusted OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.03- 2.39).

conclusionThere is significant variation in the provision of acute frailty services. Frailty-related policies and services are common at the organisational level but implemented inconsistently at the patient level. Older people with frailty or geriatric syndromes assessed by acute frailty services were more likely to be discharged without the need for overnight bed-based admission.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleUnited KingdomAcute frailty servicesAcute medical unitFrailtyPrevalenceSAMBA

Identifiers

PMID39014306
PMCPMC11251303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.