Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014297›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2024

Implementing the Effective Coach2Move Approach for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Limitations in Physical Therapist Practice: A Multi-Methods Process Evaluation.

Ward Heij, Lieke Sweerts, J Bart Staal, Philip J van der Wees, Anne Thackeray, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Thomas J Hoogeboom

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ward HeijRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6839-880X
Lieke SweertsRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Bart StaalRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Philip J van der WeesRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anne ThackerayDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Maria W G Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Thomas J HoogeboomRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw, Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development 843002703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the adoption of and fidelity to the Coach2Move approach; identify differences between physical therapists with a specialization in geriatrics and physical therapists without a specialization; explore if level of adoption and specialization explain variances in effectiveness; and explore group differences in attitudes and experiences with implementation.

methodsA multi-methods process evaluation of Coach2Move implementation through 2 education days, 3 peer-assessment meetings, and an adapted electronic health record was performed alongside a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial comparing regular care physical therapy with Coach2Move. Participants were 36 physical therapists with a specialization (n = 17) and without a specialization (n = 19) who treated 292 community-dwelling older adults. Level of adoption and fidelity were analyzed by comparing preimplementation scores with scores 1 year later. Coach2Move adoption was measured by e-assessment scores, and fidelity through health record indicators. The impact of specialization and adoption on health outcomes was examined using a mixed-model analysis of variance. Therapists' attitudes and experiences were collected through a survey based on semistructured interviews.

resultsMean (SD) total indicator scores on the e-assessment (adoption of a Coach2Move mindset) increased from baseline 17% (5%) to 47% (9%) at follow-up. Physical therapists with a specialization in geriatrics scored (mean [SD]) higher than physical therapists without (54% [6%] vs 41% [6%]). Mean (SD) indicator scores on health records (fidelity) increased from 35% (12%) at baseline to 47% (15%) at follow-up. Mean scores of physical therapists with a specialization in geriatrics were higher. Level of adoption and specialization (yes/no) did not explain the variance in effectiveness. Physical therapists identified important facilitators, including tailored education and peer-assessment meetings, whereas adequate reimbursement for the extra time investment was considered a necessity. Different workflows in practices were perceived as a barrier.

conclusionImplementation led to increased adoption and fidelity of the Coach2Move intervention by physical therapists but shows room for improvement. Attitudes toward the approach and its implementation were positive. Future implementation efforts on adoption could be improved by focusing on a fair compensation structure by third-party payers and insurance companies and optimizing organizational and financial context within practices. IMPACT: This study evaluated the implementation of Coach2Move, a clinical reasoning approach designed to increase physical activity and improve self-efficacy in older adults. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of Coach2Move to be effectively adopted by physical therapists. However, addressing therapist compensation and adapting to practice workflows are important considerations for successful large-scale implementation.

Indexed as

Aging in PlaceHealth Plan ImplementationMobility LimitationPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGeriatricsHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedOlder AdultsPhysical ActivityPhysical TherapyProcess Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39014297
PMCPMC11586087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.