ArticleNeuroradiology2024
Revisiting oligodendroglioma grading in the 2021 WHO classification: calcification and larger contrast-enhancing tumor volume may predict higher oligodendroglioma grade.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is leptomeningeal dissemination in oligodendroglioma predictable? Evidence from a scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Revisiting prognosis of oligodendroglioma patients in the 2021 WHO classification: incremental value of imaging features.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether qualitative and quantitative imaging phenotypes can predict the grade of oligodendroglioma.
methodsRetrospective chart and imaging reviews were conducted on 180 adults with oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) between 2005 and 2021. Qualitative imaging characteristics including tumor location, calcification, gliomatosis cerebri, cystic change, necrosis, and infiltrative pattern were analyzed. Quantitative imaging assessment was performed from the tumor mask via automatic segmentation to calculate total, contrast-enhancing (CE), non-enhancing (NE), and necrotic tumor volumes. Logistic analyses were conducted to determine predictors of oligodendroglioma grade.
resultsThis study included 180 patients (84 [46.7%] with grade 2 and 96 [53.3%] with grade 3 oligodendrogliomas), with a median age of 42 years (range 23-76 years), comprising 91 females and 89 males. On univariable analysis, calcification (odds ratio [OR] = 6.00, P < 0.001), necrosis (OR = 21.84, P = 0.003), presence of CE tumor (OR = 7.86, P < 0.001), larger total (OR = 1.01, P < 0.001), larger CE (OR = 2.22, P = 0.010), and larger NE (OR = 1.01, P < 0.001) tumor volumes were predictors of grade 3 oligodendroglioma. On multivariable analysis, calcification (OR = 3.79, P < 0.001) and larger CE tumor volume (OR = 2.70, P = 0.043) remained as independent predictors of grade 3 oligodendroglioma. The multivariable model exhibited an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.84), 72.8%, 79.2%, 69.1%, respectively.
conclusionPresence of calcification and larger CE tumor volume may serve as useful imaging biomarkers for prediction of oligodendroglioma grade. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Assessment of intratumoral calcification and CE tumor volume may facilitate accurate preoperative estimation of oligodendroglioma grade. Presence of intratumoral calcification and larger contrast-enhancing tumor volume were the significant predictors of higher grade oligodendroglioma based on the 2021 WHO classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39014271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.