ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Ensuring the strict and accurate adherence to inclusion criteria in clinical trials for AMD is crucial.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers Associated with the 2-Year Development of Macular Atrophy or Fibrosis in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Non-indocyanine green angiography non-invasive differentiating features in the differential diagnosis of pachychoroid neovasculopathy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a sensitivity-specificity study.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Retinal Vessel Changes in Geographic Atrophy in AMD: Insights From Imaging and Histology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Capturing the transition from intermediate to neovascular AMD: Longitudinal changes in choroidal volume and choroidal vascularity index.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.