ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Neural patient-specific 3D-2D registration in laparoscopic liver resection.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Warm-started reinforcement learning for iterative 3D/2D liver registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Assessing augmented reality displays in laparoscopic liver surgery - a clinical experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Non-rigid image-volume registration for human livers in laparoscopic surgery.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- MIS-NeRF: neural radiance fields in minimally-invasive surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- A Landmark-Free 3D-2D Rigid Liver Registration via Point Cloud Matching for Laparoscopic Surgery.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- Hidden Tumour Visualization in Augmented Monocular Liver Laparoscopy.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAugmented reality guidance in laparoscopic liver resection requires the registration of a preoperative 3D model to the intraoperative 2D image. However, 3D-2D liver registration poses challenges owing to the liver's flexibility, particularly in the limited visibility conditions of laparoscopy. Although promising, the current registration methods are computationally expensive and often necessitate manual initialisation.
methodsThe first neural model predicting the registration (NM) is proposed, represented as 3D model deformation coefficients, from image landmarks. The strategy consists in training a patient-specific model based on synthetic data generated automatically from the patient's preoperative model. A liver shape modelling technique, which further reduces time complexity, is also proposed.
resultsThe NM method was evaluated using the target registration error measure, showing an accuracy on par with existing methods, all based on numerical optimisation. Notably, NM runs much faster, offering the possibility of achieving real-time inference, a significant step ahead in this field.
conclusionThe proposed method represents the first neural method for 3D-2D liver registration. Preliminary experimental findings show comparable performance to existing methods, with superior computational efficiency. These results suggest a potential to deeply impact liver registration techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39014177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.