SynthesisPediatric surgery international2024
Robotic-assisted pull-through procedures for anorectal malformation: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative study of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectovestibular fistula.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo study the published literature on robotic-assisted pull-through procedures for anorectal malformation.
methodA PubMed search was done on 10th April 2024, with the words "robotic AND Anorectal malformation". The articles were screened for relevance and the data were compiled on the safety, feasibility, technical details, and limitations of robotic-assisted procedures in children for anorectal malformation.
resultsThe search robotic and anorectal malformation gave ten articles. Two were excluded as they were not relevant. Two articles were added from cross-reference. Ten publications on robotic-assisted procedures for anorectal malformation were studied, describing procedures in thirty-three cases. The youngest child operated was 3 months old. All except one case were done in males. Most articles were from the US and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The principles involved in robotic-assisted anorectoplasty (RAARP) were the same as that of laparoscopic procedures. Complications reported included pelvic abscess, epididymo-orchitis, and stricture of pelvic tunnel or conversion to open. The magnification and endo-wrist technology of robotics facilitated the sharp dissection and ligation at origin of fistula. The mean operating time was 228.7 min (docking and console time), shortest being 86 min and mean hospital stay was 7 days. The number of ports used varied from 3 to 4 with 8.5 mm being the most commonly used umbilical port and 8 mm as working ports, although in one article, a 12 mm port was used for telescope. The prolonged operating time and cost are the two factors to be addressed in RAARP.
conclusionRobotic surgery is feasible in infants with ARM and safe in expert hands. Robotics is a very effective tool with its better ergonomics, tremor filtration, 3D magnification, and dexterity. Increasing awareness and referral to high-volume centers can tide over the cost factor, and good training of the surgeons can reduce the operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39014174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.