Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Machine Learning for Early Discrimination Between Lung Cancer and Benign Nodules Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.
Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Classification in Lung Cancer Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer: the current state of the science on multi-omic applications.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Review
- From associations to clinical practice: translating inflammatory-nutritional indices into a machine learning-driven model for breast cancer risk stratification with cross-ethnic validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Identification and verification of immune and oxidative stress-related diagnostic indicators for malignant lung nodules through WGCNA and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Common laboratory parameters as predictors of prognosis in primary lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Lung cancer risk prediction using augmented machine learning pipelines with explainable AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- LungPanelNet: a machine learning-based approach for the early prediction and differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Colorectal Polyps Based on Electronic Health Records.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Article
- A Hybrid 2D Gaussian Filter and Deep Learning Approach with Visualization of Class Activation for Automatic Lung and Colon Cancer Diagnosis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer poses a global health threat necessitating early detection and precise staging for improved patient outcomes. This study focuses on developing and validating a machine learning-based risk model for early lung cancer screening and staging, using routine clinical data.
methodsTwo medical center, observational, retrospective studies were conducted, involving 2312 lung cancer patients and 653 patients with benign nodules. Machine learning techniques, including differential analysis and feature selection, were employed to identify key factors for modeling. The study focused on variables such as nodule density, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), age, and lifestyle habits. The Logistic Regression model was utilized for early diagnoses, and the XGBoost model was utilized for staging based on selected features.
resultsFor early diagnoses, the Logistic Regression model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.716 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.607-0.826), with 0.703 sensitivity and 0.654 specificity. The XGBoost model excelled in distinguishing late-stage from early-stage lung cancer, exhibiting an AUC of 0.913 (95% CI 0.862-0.963), with 0.909 sensitivity and 0.814 specificity. These findings highlight the model's potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and staging in lung cancer.
conclusionThis study introduces a novel machine learning-based risk model for early lung cancer screening and staging, leveraging routine clinical information and laboratory data. The model shows promise in enhancing accuracy, mitigating overdiagnosis, and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39014163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.