Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014163›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Machine Learning for Early Discrimination Between Lung Cancer and Benign Nodules Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.

Wei Wei, Yun Wang, Renren Ouyang, Ting Wang, Rujia Chen, Xu Yuan, Feng Wang, Shiji Wu, Hongyan Hou

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei Wei *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yun Wang *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Renren OuyangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ting WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Rujia ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xu YuanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. fengwang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Shiji WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. wilson547@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Hongyan HouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. tjhouhongyan@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Health Commission of Hubei Province WJ2023M010State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die and Mould Technology P2023-014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer poses a global health threat necessitating early detection and precise staging for improved patient outcomes. This study focuses on developing and validating a machine learning-based risk model for early lung cancer screening and staging, using routine clinical data.

methodsTwo medical center, observational, retrospective studies were conducted, involving 2312 lung cancer patients and 653 patients with benign nodules. Machine learning techniques, including differential analysis and feature selection, were employed to identify key factors for modeling. The study focused on variables such as nodule density, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), age, and lifestyle habits. The Logistic Regression model was utilized for early diagnoses, and the XGBoost model was utilized for staging based on selected features.

resultsFor early diagnoses, the Logistic Regression model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.716 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.607-0.826), with 0.703 sensitivity and 0.654 specificity. The XGBoost model excelled in distinguishing late-stage from early-stage lung cancer, exhibiting an AUC of 0.913 (95% CI 0.862-0.963), with 0.909 sensitivity and 0.814 specificity. These findings highlight the model's potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and staging in lung cancer.

conclusionThis study introduces a novel machine learning-based risk model for early lung cancer screening and staging, leveraging routine clinical information and laboratory data. The model shows promise in enhancing accuracy, mitigating overdiagnosis, and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleEarly detection of cancerLung cancerMachine learningScreeningStaging

Identifiers

PMID39014163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.