Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014130›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

Revisiting the "Timed Up and Go" test: a 12-s cut-off can predict Hospitalization Associated Functional Decline in older adults.

Orly Gatenio-Hefling, Roy Tzemah-Shahar, Kfir Asraf, Omer Dilian, Efrat Gil, Maayan Agmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Orly Gatenio-Hefling *Faculty of Health and Social Welfare, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Roy Tzemah-Shahar *Faculty of Health and Social Welfare, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-1888
Kfir AsrafMax Stern Yezreel Valley College, Emek Yezreel, Israel.
Omer DilianFaculty of Health and Social Welfare, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Efrat Gil *HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Maayan Agmon *Faculty of Health and Social Welfare, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. agmon.mn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1855-1199

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 1216/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of functional decline, a major risk among hospitalized older adults, can facilitate interventions that could significantly reduce it. We aimed to examine the contribution of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test in predicting Hospitalization Associated Functional Decline (HAFD) among older adults, able to independently ambulate before admission. We used a cross-sectional study design; a total of 310 older adults (age ≥ 65) hospitalized in internal medicine wards between December 2018 and August 2020 were included; exclusion criteria were inability to ambulate, a diagnosis restricting mobility, hospitalization for end-of-life care, or impaired cognition. The Modified Barthel Index was used to assess HAFD; it was administered at admission to evaluate patients' independence in activities of daily living 2 weeks prior hospitalization, and at discharge. The TUG test was performed on admission and to predict significant functional decline (defined by a reduction of three points or more in the Modified Barthel Index), while accounting for demographics, length of hospitalization, comorbidity burden (Charlson's comorbidity index), and cognitive function (ALFI-MMSE). Participants were divided into three groups according to their TUG score-under or over a cut-off score of 12 s, or inability to complete the test. Adjusting for age, comorbidity, cognitive ability, and duration of hospitalization, the group that performed the test in less than 12 s showed no statistically significant change in the Modified Barthel Index, therefore no significant HAFD. The other groups showed a statistically significant decline in function. Risk for significant HAFD is currently underestimated in clinical settings, limited to subjective assessment, and underused in the context of implementing early interventions to prevent HAFD. The TUG may support screening for those at risk of hospitalizing-associated functional decline and could help identify patients suitable for preventative interventions.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingGeriatric AssessmentHospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleAssessmentFunctional declineMobilityRisk

Identifiers

PMID39014130
PMCPMC11872843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.