ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024
Blood pressure time at target and its prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes: a scoping review.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle profiles and long-term blood pressure control are associated with lower risks of stroke and all-cause mortality among treated hypertensive patients: findings from the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Trial
- Postpartum blood pressure trends and time in target range during remote blood pressure monitoring.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Long-term SBP time in target and risk of cardiovascular events in older adults: a secondary analysis of the ASPREE cohort.American journal of hypertension · 2026Observational
- Hypertension Control Rates Before and After Implementation of a Multicomponent Quality Improvement Program in Medicare Beneficiaries Primarily of Hispanic Origin in a Large Health System in South Florida, 2011-2018.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Observational
- Blood Pressure Outcomes Among US Veterans Initiating Hypertension Treatment, 2014 to 2023.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- Physician-led telemedical care enhances blood pressure control in hypertension: a randomized-controlled pilot study (REMOTE-control-HTN).European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Systolic blood pressure time in target range within 24 h and in-hospital death of critically ill patients and the role of ventricular arrhythmias: a MIMIC-IV analysis with external validation in the eICU-CRD database.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Lead-Free Potassium Sodium Niobate-Based Wearable Ultrasonic Patches for Blood Pressure Detection.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proportion of time that blood pressure (BP) readings are at treatment target levels, commonly referred to as time at target or time in therapeutic range (BP-TTR), is emerging as a useful measure for evaluating hypertension management effectiveness and assessing longitudinal BP control. However, method of determination for BP-TTR differs across studies. This review identifies variations in BP-TTR determination methodologies and its potential prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes. Following PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines, literature was systematically searched in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and systematic reviews published in English were screened. Of 369 articles identified, 17 articles were included. Studies differed in the BP targets used (e.g., BP < 140/90 mmHg or 130/80 mmHg; systolic BP within 110-130 mmHg or 120-140 mmHg), BP-TTR measurement duration (range 24 h to 15 years), and calculation method (linear interpolation method, n = 12 [71%]; proportion of BP readings at target, n = 5 [29%]). Regardless of method, studies consistently demonstrated that higher BP-TTR was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Six of eight studies found the association was independent of mean achieved BP or last measured BP. Despite variation in methods of BP-TTR determination, these studies demonstrated the potential prognostic value of BP-TTR for cardiovascular outcomes beyond current BP control measures. We recommend standardization of BP-TTR methodology, with preference for linear interpolation method when BP measurements are few or less frequent, and proportion of BP readings method when large number of BP readings are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.