Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014083›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Male attractiveness is subjective to exposure to males of different attractiveness in fruit flies.

Laure-Anne Poissonnier, Etienne Danchin, Guillaume Isabel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Short-term increases in rival number improves single mating productivity in maleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laure-Anne PoissonnierCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), UMR 5169, CNRS, Université de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France. laure-anne.poissonnier@ur.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-6964
Etienne DanchinCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), UMR 5169, CNRS, Université de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France.
Guillaume IsabelCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), UMR 5169, CNRS, Université de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Postdoc Fellowship 1223114ANR MoleCulture ANR-18-CE37-0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate choice is a crucial decision in any animal. In terms of fitness, the best mate is the one that leads to the most abundant and productive offspring. Pairing with a low-quality mate would reduce fitness, generating selection for accurate and subtle mate choice in all animal species. Hence, mate choice is expected to be highly context dependent, and should depend on other potential options. For instance, a medium-quality male can constitute the best option when all other males are in poorer condition, but not when there are better-quality males available. Therefore, animals are predicted to gather information about their social context and adapt their mate choice to it. Here, we report on experiments in which we manipulated the social environment of females of Drosophila melanogaster and found that after encountering a high or a low-quality male, they take more or less time to accept copulation with another male, suggesting that females adapt their mating strategy to their social context. We also report on a similar effect in D. biarmiceps. Thus, male attractiveness appears to depend on the quality of recently met males, suggesting that male attractiveness is subjective, indicating plastic and context dependent mate choice.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterMating Preference, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID39014083
PMCPMC11252249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.