ArticleScientific reports2024
Quantifying the uncertainty of LLM hallucination spreading in complex adaptive social networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing explainability and performance of the depression detection model on social media utilizing feature engineering and LLMs.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
- iS2C2: a cointelligent platform for mechanistic discovery of disease cellular crosstalk.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Large language models show Dunning-Kruger-like effects in multilingual fact-checking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Performance comparison of large language models in boron neutron capture therapy knowledge assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Two-stage prompting framework with predefined verification steps for evaluating diagnostic reasoning tasks on two datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4 Omni, Gemini Advanced, and Gemini 1.5 in Answering Frequently Asked Questions Regarding High Tibial Osteotomy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Challenges of Implementing LLMs in Clinical Practice: Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-model assurance analysis showing large language models are highly vulnerable to adversarial hallucination attacks during clinical decision support.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- An intelligent guided troubleshooting method for aircraft based on HybirdRAG.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring and Comparing the Use of Large Language Models in Supporting Osteoporosis Health Consultations.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming a significant source of content generation in social networks, which is a typical complex adaptive system (CAS). However, due to their hallucinatory nature, LLMs produce false information that can spread through social networks, which will impact the stability of the whole society. The uncertainty of LLMs false information spread within social networks is attributable to the diversity of individual behaviors, intricate interconnectivity, and dynamic network structures. Quantifying the uncertainty of false information spread by LLMs in social networks is beneficial for preemptively devising strategies to defend against threats. To address these challenges, we propose an LLMs hallucination-aware dynamic modeling method via agent-based probability distributions, spread popularity and community affiliation, to quantify the uncertain spreading of LLMs hallucination in social networks. We set up the node attributes and behaviors in the model based on real-world data. For evaluation, we consider the spreaders, informed people, discerning and unwilling non-spreaders as indicators, and quantified the spreading under different LLMs task situations, such as QA, dialogue, and summarization, as well as LLMs versions. Furthermore, we conduct experiments using real-world LLM hallucination data combined with social network features to ensure the validity of the proposed quantifying scheme.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.