Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39014013›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Quantifying the uncertainty of LLM hallucination spreading in complex adaptive social networks.

Guozhi Hao, Jun Wu, Qianqian Pan, Rosario Morello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guozhi HaoGraduate School of Information, Production and Systems, Waseda University, Fukuoka, 808-0135, Japan.
Jun WuGraduate School of Information, Production and Systems, Waseda University, Fukuoka, 808-0135, Japan. jun.wu@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-6980
Qianqian PanGraduate School of Information, Production and Systems, Waseda University, Fukuoka, 808-0135, Japan.
Rosario MorelloDepartment of Information Engineering, Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Via Graziella, Reggio Calabria, 89122, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-5789

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 202308050021National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 61972255National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U21B2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming a significant source of content generation in social networks, which is a typical complex adaptive system (CAS). However, due to their hallucinatory nature, LLMs produce false information that can spread through social networks, which will impact the stability of the whole society. The uncertainty of LLMs false information spread within social networks is attributable to the diversity of individual behaviors, intricate interconnectivity, and dynamic network structures. Quantifying the uncertainty of false information spread by LLMs in social networks is beneficial for preemptively devising strategies to defend against threats. To address these challenges, we propose an LLMs hallucination-aware dynamic modeling method via agent-based probability distributions, spread popularity and community affiliation, to quantify the uncertain spreading of LLMs hallucination in social networks. We set up the node attributes and behaviors in the model based on real-world data. For evaluation, we consider the spreaders, informed people, discerning and unwilling non-spreaders as indicators, and quantified the spreading under different LLMs task situations, such as QA, dialogue, and summarization, as well as LLMs versions. Furthermore, we conduct experiments using real-world LLM hallucination data combined with social network features to ensure the validity of the proposed quantifying scheme.

Identifiers

PMID39014013
PMCPMC11252443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.