Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013994›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Discovering novel genomic regions explaining adaptation of bread wheat to conservation agriculture through GWAS.

Amit Kumar Mazumder, Rajbir Yadav, Manjeet Kumar, Prashanth Babu, Naresh Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Amolkumar U Solanke, Shabir H Wani, Adel I Alalawy, Abdulrahman Alasmari and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ancient diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amit Kumar MazumderDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rajbir YadavDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Manjeet KumarDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Prashanth BabuDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Naresh KumarDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sanjay Kumar SinghDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Amolkumar U SolankeNational Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Shabir H WaniMountain Research Centre for Field Crops, Khudwani, 192101, India.
Adel I AlalawyDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlasmariDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Kiran B GaikwadDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. gaikwadkb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9076-8640

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 12-229Indian Council of Agricultural Research 12-229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To sustainably increase wheat yield to meet the growing world population's food demand in the face of climate change, Conservation Agriculture (CA) is a promising approach. Still, there is a lack of genomic studies investigating the genetic basis of crop adaptation to CA. To dissect the genetic architecture of 19 morpho-physiological traits that could be involved in the enhanced adaptation and performance of genotypes under CA, we performed GWAS to identify MTAs under four contrasting production regimes viz., conventional tillage timely sown (CTTS), conservation agriculture timely sown (CATS), conventional tillage late sown (CTLS) and conservation agriculture late sown (CALS) using an association panel of 183 advanced wheat breeding lines along with 5 checks. Traits like Phi2 (Quantum yield of photosystem II; CATS:0.37, CALS: 0.31), RC (Relative chlorophyll content; CATS:55.51, CALS: 54.47) and PS1 (Active photosystem I centers; CATS:2.45, CALS: 2.23) have higher mean values in CA compared to CT under both sowing times. GWAS identified 80 MTAs for the studied traits across four production environments. The phenotypic variation explained (PVE) by these QTNs ranged from 2.15 to 40.22%. Gene annotation provided highly informative SNPs associated with Phi2, NPQ (Quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching), PS1, and RC which were linked with genes that play crucial roles in the physiological adaptation under both CA and CT. A highly significant SNP AX94651261 (9.43% PVE) was identified to be associated with Phi2, while two SNP markers AX94730536 (30.90% PVE) and AX94683305 (16.99% PVE) were associated with NPQ. Identified QTNs upon validation can be used in marker-assisted breeding programs to develop CA adaptive genotypes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAgricultureGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociTriticumBreadGenome, PlantGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChlorophyll fluorescenceConservation agricultureGenome-wide association studies (GWAS)Physiological adaptationsWheat

Identifiers

PMID39013994
PMCPMC11252282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.